Re: Samba-fs with 2.1.xxx?

Mark Lord (mlord@pobox.com)
Tue, 01 Dec 1998 14:23:30 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Matthias Welwarsky: "[2.1.130/Alpha] VGA console messed colours (again)"
Previous message: Nigel Metheringham: "Re: Y2k compliance"
Maybe in reply to: Mark Lord: "Samba-fs with 2.1.xxx?"
Next in thread: Mark Lord: "Re: Samba-fs with 2.1.xxx?"

Khimenko Victor wrote:
>
> 30-Nov-98 23:18 you wrote:
> > Does anyone know of an update (to anything)
> > to allow use of smbfs with 2.1.130 ??
>
> Read changes sometimes and update samba as suggested FROM SOURCES. There are
> required smbmount ...

smbmount does not recompile from sources against 2.1.130.
It gives zillions of errors (try it!).

-- mlord@pobox.com

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthias Welwarsky: "[2.1.130/Alpha] VGA console messed colours (again)"
Previous message: Nigel Metheringham: "Re: Y2k compliance"
Maybe in reply to: Mark Lord: "Samba-fs with 2.1.xxx?"
Next in thread: Mark Lord: "Re: Samba-fs with 2.1.xxx?"