Re: yesss, sound in 2.0.36

Peter T. Breuer (ptb@it.uc3m.es)
Wed, 25 Nov 1998 22:42:10 +0100 (MET)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Missing from includes?"
Previous message: kwrohrer@ce.mediaone.net: "Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #2839 (writable /proc/<pid>/cmdli"
In reply to: Benjamin Redelings I: "MM experience with 2.1.130-3: swapping versus uncaching?"

"A month of sundays ago Alan Cox wrote:"
>
> I didnt take it that way, its just that some of the support stuff
> modular sound and a few other things are now using got merged into 2.0.36
> proper rather than 2.0.35 - notably support for multiple file modules
> with some files exporting symbols (Rules.make)

The only criticism of the 2.0.36 I had was that it plainly should have been
2.0.56 - the changes since 2.0.35 are slightly too great to follow easily
by looking at the single diff.

> Alan

I'll look again at Rules.make. I thought I got the stuff about one module
calling another. You seem to be talking about something other than that
here ... (yes, I had to cope with the Chastain Makefile, and it almost beat
me).

Peter

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Missing from includes?"
Previous message: kwrohrer@ce.mediaone.net: "Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #2839 (writable /proc/<pid>/cmdli"
In reply to: Benjamin Redelings I: "MM experience with 2.1.130-3: swapping versus uncaching?"