Re: Dynamic IP hack (PR#294)

Erik Corry (erik@arbat.com)
Mon, 19 Oct 1998 10:12:56 +0200


In article <19981019171541.A4031@caffeine.ix.net.nz> you wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 12:47:46PM -0700, Eric Schenk wrote:

>> [...] Frankly the real problem is that the internet was never
>> designed to allow for dynamic IP addresses, and anything we do to
>> hack them in results in one problem or another. Anyway, I don't
>> like this solution much, but I can't offer the right solution
>> either.

> Why not do what some other OSs do - that is, attempt to dial on
> demand via some other mechanism only when the applications needs to,
> and defer socket creation undit the interface is up?

Because most of these solutions will cause more dialling. We
don't want a situation where people complain that 2.2 is costing
them a lot of money because it dials when 2.0 didn't.

Also, the original dyn_addr hack is already in 2.1, it works
the problems are theoretical, and you can switch it off.

-- 
Erik Corry erik@arbat.com           Ceterum censeo, Microsoftem esse delendam!

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/