Re: bug introduced in 2.0.34

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sun, 18 Oct 1998 17:40:48 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [Only Tenuously On Topic] Profibus for Linux - license advice wanted."
Previous message: H.J. Lu: "Re: Massive TCPv4 bad checksum"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "bug introduced in 2.0.34"
Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: bug introduced in 2.0.34"

> and will not be supported by libc or glibc. Each and
> every occurrence of this field in the kernel source (other
> than the declaration) is a bug.
>
> So, it must be a bad idea to introduce more of these bugs,
> instead of removing the few occurrences that exist.

Well the kernel needs to know if daylight savings is in force or not. I'll
take patches to change this if you want but for most people the above
works, bug or not ;)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [Only Tenuously On Topic] Profibus for Linux - license advice wanted."
Previous message: H.J. Lu: "Re: Massive TCPv4 bad checksum"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "bug introduced in 2.0.34"
Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: bug introduced in 2.0.34"