you wrote:
> > No. sysctl_ip_dynaddr&3 != 0 as soon as one of the first two bits is
>
> Right. I'll have a coffee and go to bed then.
Strange combination atleast if one usally does lie in the bed not stand.
:-)
> So, if I'd set dynaddr to 10 to get verbosity + asymetric routing hack,
> then the code would behave as I would have enabled bit 0 which is
> obviously not true. Lack of consistency for some compatibility?
Thing about: Does it make any sense to enable verbosity without enabling
the feature? Does it make any sense to enable the asymetric routing hack
without the RST-provoking (see the documentation for)?
Malware
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/