Re: Fw: sendpkt: Connection refusedy

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 13 Oct 1998 22:22:02 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: "per-process" limits (was: Showstopper list)"
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: 2.2 imminent.. /proc security fix?"

> IMO, this interface is broken. I came to the solution, that
> SO_BSDCOMPAT is the Right Thing and should be the default!
> (I don't know, if this would break some 'standard'...)

It breaks setups and applications that rely on the current behaviour
so its not that trivial

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: "per-process" limits (was: Showstopper list)"
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: 2.2 imminent.. /proc security fix?"