> On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> > The 53x700 eats CPU, the Adaptec seems better in this case, even
> > the 1540B which has no CPU.
>
> I don't understand why a 53x700 would eat CPU. Are you sure you don't
> mean a 53x400?
I've dug up some info on a past system and it was the 53c810 that
it had. It definitely used a lot of CPU, though I don't have any
idea how it compares to the 53x700.
If that shouldn't have happened, I might have just tried before
the drivers got real good.
-- csh - shendrix@widomaker.com - http://www.widomaker.com - Linux 2.0.x ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "All of us get lost in the darkness, dreamers turn to look at the stars" -- Rush- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/