> > Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> Oops sorry. Yes I was on the wrong card for the discussion. You btw arent
> the only one to report that. I've got about 10 reports on the epic100
> and irq problems. Normally disguised as SMP problems ;).
So it sounds like the behavior that we are seeing on our 2.0.35 SMP
box with dual epic100's is reproducible elsewhere.
Is there anything we can do to help debug this. A down and up of both
our interfaces fixes the problem. If they are locked is there any
type of diagnostic information that would be helpful to obtain?
Since this is a production box with around 150 active IMAP feeds at
any given time we typically don't dally around for too long when the
NIC's decide to check out.... :-)
BTW about the only other thing in the box is a DPT-3334UW if that
helps in pinning down a common pattern.
> Alan
Greg
}-- End of excerpt from Alan Cox
As always,
Dr. G.W. Wettstein Enjellic Systems Development - Specialists in
4206 N. 19th Ave. intranet based enterprise information solutions.
Fargo, ND 58102 WWW: http://www.enjellic.com
Phone: 701-281-1686 EMAIL: greg@wind.enjellic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"One of the reporters asked if the could "see" the INTERNET worm.
They tried to explain that it wasn't something that you could actually
see but is was merely a program that was running in the background.
One of the reporters asked, 'What if you had a color monitor?'"
-- UNKNOWN
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/