Re: [PATCH] plip.c in 2.1.125

Ely Wilson (plexus@ionet.net)
Sun, 11 Oct 1998 06:55:51 -0700 (MST)

I had thought someone would react adversely to the change in the timeout
delay count. I changed it back to 3000 here since it didn't seem to make
a difference eiterh way with teh otehr change (PLIP_DEBUG making CPP time
decisions about teh timeout printk) and _DEBUG = 0.

At any rate, was the rest of it a mistake? I'm hoping not, my aim was to
get rid of the display corrupting timeout messages. Not fine tune the
source to a 486.

%---* ely % Gee, if i were only here to _see_ this.

On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Hmm, beyond all obvious, i added 1500 usecs to the timout delay to reduce
>
> Please don't retune plip for your own machine. Its currently about right
> for generic machines, and the timeouts are tunable with plipconfig
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/