<snip>
> I am regretfully not the one to debug low-level Kernel scsi drivers, I
> have no low-level Kernel experience, I don't have the Adaptec 1542
> specs either.
About the same here, tho I'd be willing to risk my mail server for
testing and such if it ment a stable driver...
>
> IF 2.2 is released without these issues resolved, we'd better mark
> Adaptec 1542 support "EXPERIMENTAL" again.
Sadly, I'm with you on this one, or mark it 'UNSTABLE'..
(Its not EXPERIMENTAL, its perfectly tested and stress tested, it just
fails a few of them is bad ways, erm, that reminds me of windows)
Or, if its really really needed, and I can convince myself to risk it,
and I can find someone to help out*, I'd be willing to take a swing at
trying to fix it, at least a little..
*) Point me at the right docs, time after time after time, answer
questions from those docs which are on the first page, try and keep me
from massively trashing my non-backed up drives, etc.. (=:]
Zephaniah E, Hull, <--- Now looking for a way to get a aha154x on a
machine he can be less cairfull on..
>
> --
> Matthias Andree
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/