The only drawback i sthat egcs will throw a great deal of warnings, but,
this could be fixed with some cleanup, then again it would be expensive
just to clean up warnings...
%--* ely
On Fri, 9 Oct 1998, Michael Dale Long wrote:
> On 8 Oct 1998, david parsons wrote:
>
> > For bizarre and complex application-related reasons, one of my clients
> > has reached a point where they need to start building their modified
> > kernel with a less-buggy compiler than 2.7.2. We cannot change to a
> > 2.1.x kernel, for size and customization reasons (this kernel has 3
> > months of tcp customization in it to support transparent proxies as well
> > as cleanups of tcp buglets), and I know that the 2.0.2x kernels Just
> > Won't Work with egcs, so we'll have to fix it. (This is not a problem,
>
> ???? I've been compiling 2.0.36pre kernels and 2.1.12x kernels just fine
> with egcs-1.03. Am I missing something, or is this a problem with a later
> version of egcs?
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/