Re: [OT] RE: UDI and Free Software (fwd)

Bob Taylor (brtaylor@inreach.com)
Thu, 08 Oct 1998 18:32:51 -0700


In message <361D11E1.4666D087@tbcnet.com>, Terry L Ridder writes:
> Marcin Dalecki wrote:

[snip]

> Instead of spending energy "reverse engineering" a binary-only UDI
> driver
> it would wiser to spend that energy educating vendors to the benefits
> of releasing hardware documentation so that the Freeware/OpenSource/GNU
> GPL
> communities are able to write the drivers.

It is my gut feeling that it would be much less expensive for a hardware
manufacturer to contract out drivers than pay for one software engineer.
If they publish their specs, they can get drivers for the free OS's free.
The only reason not to is a corporate laywer saying "gotta keep them
secrets so nobody can steal 'em". TINNUTS. :-)

[snip]

Bob

TINNUTS--there is nothing new under the sun.

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bob Taylor             Email: brtaylor@inreach.com            |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Like the ad says, at 300 dpi you can tell she's wearing a     |
| swimsuit. At 600 dpi you can tell it's wet. At 1200 dpi you   |
| can tell it's painted on. I suppose at 2400 dpi you can tell  |
| if the paint is giving her a rash. (So says Joshua R. Poulson)|
+---------------------------------------------------------------+

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/