Re: 'disposable' dirty pages [was: Out Of Memory in v. 2.1]

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Thu, 8 Oct 1998 19:35:50 +0100 (BST)


> > Not if you marked it discardable - you just said that zeroed it.
> Well, that's the issue. It's more efficient if it doesn't.

When you discard a page you will need to put something back on a fault
in. Thats going to be the zero page so the cost is basically nil. Its
far more useful than a straight forward reclaim of zeroed pages because
apps that know about it can use reclaimable memory for things like
pixmap caches providing there is a suitable way to get info on what
was discarded.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/