Well, it's just that MUAs should have three choices:
- reply to sender
- reply all
- reply to recipients (aka reply to mailing-list (aka followup)
And since you can't tell whether reply-to holds the address of the sender or
of the mailing-list (i.e. recipients) or (as was originally intended I believe)
of the destination intended for the answer (i.e. neither the sender, nor the
recipients), MUAs should just ignore it.
ObKernel: is there a reason for memory-detect.patch not to be included in
recent versions of the 2.0 kernels ?
Stefan "who reads it off his newsserver anyway"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/