IIRC, this is the second time you send these nice formatted
paragraphs:
Nathan Hand wrote:
> Try also so see this from Linus's point of view. He it ultimately
> responsible for faults in the kernel, because he's the one who is
> designated "patch reviewer" for everything placed in the official
> kernel tree. The problems aren't *really* his fault, but he takes
> a lot of the responsibility on his shoulders, and people do point
> fingers at Linus when bad patches get in.
>
> Linus might seem snappy, but if I received a 700k patch with some
> note saying "this should work", I'd ask for an explanation too! I
> would also get peeved if people start *complaining* that I wasn't
> matching the standards they expect: this is Linus's baby and he's
> under no obligation to take *any* patches that don't suit him. He
> is a benevolent dictator, not an omnipotent benefactor.
>
> [and so on, all the same width without additional spaces]
Does this program has a name? :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/