Re: "Official" kernel source

Philip Blundell (philb@gnu.org)
Tue, 29 Sep 1998 23:28:36 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: 2.1.123 and fbcon.c"
Previous message: Ricardo Galli Granada: "Re: linux SMP stability or lack thereof"
Maybe in reply to: Shane Stringer: ""Official" kernel source"

>I like the idea of 2.2.0preX. When 2.2.0 is close to be released
>it has to be tested in a much bigger scale than the 2.1.x series is...=20

I wonder how many VERSION_CODE checks like the one in tulip.c are lurking in
the wings. :-)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: 2.1.123 and fbcon.c"
Previous message: Ricardo Galli Granada: "Re: linux SMP stability or lack thereof"
Maybe in reply to: Shane Stringer: ""Official" kernel source"