ketil@ii.uib.no wrote:
> Rik van Riel <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> writes:
>
> > The issue with QNX4 vs. some major overhaul of a central
> > subsystem is that QNX4fs doesn't affect system stability
> > for people who aren't using it.
>
> Simple question: Would the stable version 2.2 be released with a
> (hypothetically) bug-ridden, disk-corrupting QNXfs driver?
>
> ~kzm
> --
> If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html