> Rik van Riel <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> writes:
>
> > The issue with QNX4 vs. some major overhaul of a central
> > subsystem is that QNX4fs doesn't affect system stability
> > for people who aren't using it.
>
> Simple question: Would the stable version 2.2 be released with a
> (hypothetically) bug-ridden, disk-corrupting QNXfs driver?
QNXfs is off by default, and marked expirmental. It's also READ ONLY
unless you turn on another option which has warnings about being really
expirmental.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html