Re: smbfs

Bill Hawes (whawes@star.net)
Tue, 08 Sep 1998 15:09:06 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: kwrohrer@ce.mediaone.net: "Re: Are we *really* in a feature freeze?"
Previous message: Alex Buell: "Re: [TIMINGS] Re: 2.1.xxx makes Electric Fence 22x slower"
Maybe in reply to: David Fries: "smbfs"

David Fries wrote:
>
> I'm running 2.1.119 with smbfs compiled as a module and win95 bug
> workaround on. I'm getting,
> SMBFS: need mount version 6
> from the kernel and smbmount is saying mount error: Invalid argument
>
> Both mounts I have are in the 2 something range and they sould both be very
> recent, or could someone suggest where I can get what I need?
>
> AeroSpace:/var/log# mount --version
> mount: mount-2.7l
> ii ksmbfs 2.0.1-2 Mount and umount commands for the smbfs.

Please read the Documentation/filesystems/smbfs.txt file for info on
smbfs mount utilities.

Regards,
Bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html

Next message: kwrohrer@ce.mediaone.net: "Re: Are we *really* in a feature freeze?"
Previous message: Alex Buell: "Re: [TIMINGS] Re: 2.1.xxx makes Electric Fence 22x slower"
Maybe in reply to: David Fries: "smbfs"