Re: IPv4 kernel messages

Jamie Lokier (lkd@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Tue, 8 Sep 1998 15:20:15 +0100


On Mon, Sep 07, 1998 at 10:33:05PM +0200, MOLNAR Ingo wrote:
> yep it was developed on a PII, which has a pipelined MMX unit. Also make
> sure both buffers are 8 byte aligned. (which is usually not true for
> random malloc() or auto-allocated buffers). wrong alignment causes very
> bad MMX performance.

I believe the P5 MMX unit is also somewhat pipelined.
8 byte alignment is very important, but perhaps equally important
(according to an MMX conference I attended a couple of years ago)
is the order in which you read and write within cache lines.

Because the P5 does write-through caching while PII does write-back, I'd
expect the read and write ordering to be a lot more critical for the P5.

This means you have to be (1) cache aligned, not just 8 bytes; (2) have
to get the access order right, don't ask me what it is though :-)

Really, the right MMX checksum on the P5 should max out the memory
busses. The overhead would be in the FPU context save/restore and
switching to MMX mode.

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html