>And right now, I'd like people to concentrate on 2.2.x,
>because 2.3.x will be around for a long time..
I'm kind of disappointed by this. I'd prefer to see shorter development
cycles, maybe releasing a new stable series every 6-9 months or so.
It's been over 2 years since 2.0.0 was released. In terms of kernel
development, those 2 years have allowed an awful lot of changes, and
people on stable kernels have to either wait for a new stable kernel
series or use some hacked together backport to get at the new features.
Tet
-- ``Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils'' - General George Stark --------------------+--------------+---------------------------------------- tethys@ml.com | Micro$oft: | Linux, the choice of a GNU generation. tet@astradyne.co.uk | Just say no! | See http://www.uk.linux.org for details- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html