Re: regparm.. monstrosity?

Aaron M. Ucko (amu@mit.edu)
04 Sep 1998 12:40:52 -0400


Ragnar Hojland Espinosa <ragnar@lightside.ddns.org> writes:

> Well, I must be overlooking something really obvious, because regparm cant
> be _this_ broken.

>From the (Info) gcc manual:

*Warning:* if you use this switch, and NUM is nonzero, then you
must build all modules with the same value, including any
libraries. This includes the system libraries and startup modules.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC <amu@mit.edu> (finger amu@monk.mit.edu)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html