Re: Implementing Meta File information in Linux

ketil@ii.uib.no
02 Sep 1998 11:41:42 +0200


hpa@transmeta.com (H. Peter Anvin) writes:

> Most of the uses for "forky files" apply to executables, though.

What, exactly, are the ``uses for "forky files"''? Most people seem to
assume it is somehow necessary to store per file icons (which I think is
wrong, I want per file *type* icons, which I'll be happy to define
elsewhere) and file type (which /etc/magic seems to deal with just fine)
along with each file. Why? And what other meta information is it
necessary to store?

I don't mean to sound condescending or anything; I am genuinely
curious, since it apparently is so obvious to everybody that this is a
necessity, and I just don't get the point.

~kzm

-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html