> Not 100%, true. Not really a reason to drop it completely I think, since
> gcc is fixable. It actually is a rather small fix, I just didn't have
> the time and energy anymore to fight with the rest of the gcc-team to
> get this last patch in in a way that was acceptable to them.
> Mind you, it took me two months to produce a compiler and libc that
> worked flawlessly with regparm support up till and including regparm=5.
> It then took me 1.7 years to actually get 99% of all needed patches into
> gcc.
Is it possible to post remaining 1% here (unless it is too big),
preferably relative to egcs ? This should stop other people from doing
this and should show that problem really is fixable.
> Maybe this has changed with egcs, and getting patches in has become easier.
> I didn't have time to try this out yet.
egcs was designed for this...
Pavel
-- I'm really pavel@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz. Pavel Look at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/ ;-).- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html