Re: OFFTOPIC: e2fsprogs and +2Gb partitions

Gordon Oliver (gordo@telsur.cl)
Fri, 19 Jun 1998 16:18:47 -0400


... Mark H. Wood said ...
>"Duplication" tends to be read as "we have multiple copies of the
>information and they are maintained in parallel by hand". "Replication"
>tends to be read as "we have multiple copies of the information and some
>automatic mechanism keeps them consistent within a few
>{seconds|minutes|hours}". Given what I know about my own ability to keep
>things consistent manually, I much prefer replication to duplication.
>Does that help?

perhaps then, someone should go about putting together a perl script to
extract useful definitions from the kernel and put them in a "public" set
of headers. This satisfies Linus' problem (stifling kernel changes), and
the problem of others (slow migration of constants to copies/packages).
The extracted headers could then be published as a separate set of headers
that would go with each kernel. They would probably (hopefully) not change
all that often. This would change the current state of duplication into
replication.

NOTE: The separate headers should _not_ be part of the kernel distribution!
and they should probably be minimalist (i.e. put something in if it is _used_
but only then)

-gordo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu