Re: Corruption in 2.1.106
Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 19 Jun 1998 17:25:13 +0100 (BST)
> Yes. I've been reporting this. My guess is that something is not being
> completely written to the disk during dismount (umount). But if you
> see memory corruption (which I don't see), it may be something entirely
> different. I'm still using 2.1.105, but with these patches:
No this is damaging old data not new stuff. I'm now running a clone of
the 2.1.106 setup on the older (known very good hw) box to see what occurs
and I've done the SDRAM shuffle on the new one
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu