Probably asked before. (VFAT)

Nathan Clemons (linux@ici.net)
Mon, 15 Jun 1998 13:18:19 -0400

I know this problem has probably been asked many times
before, but I have drives that I can see underneath Win95
but not linux. I upgraded from 2.0.30 to 2.0.34 and tried both
nls/vfat/fat module support and now have them directly in
the kernel. Still can't mount them.

Gives me an error message along the lines of
[MS-DOS FAT, 12 Rel, FAT-16, uid=0, gid=0, etc.]

is this saying that it's Fat16? *puzzle* How can I tell which
one it's using, and what does .34 support? Has anyone made
any types of fixes in regards to these problems, or is it my
own stupidity =) (*im not afraid to admit it when it is the case*).

Any ideas?

StormeRider --- http://www.windsofstorm.net/wos
silk@ici.net --- #telnet://winds.windsofstorm.net:4004
linux@ici.net --- Slackware 2.0.30

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu