Re: BUGFIX: 2.1.106 (and earlier) /proc/<pid>/* does not honour setuid(2).

Vadim E. Kogan (vadim@vadim.gem.net)
Mon, 15 Jun 1998 02:41:32 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Remote fork() and Parallel programming"
Previous message: Martin Mares: "Re: [PATCH] Cyrix detection for kernels 2.0.34+"
Maybe in reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "BUGFIX: 2.1.106 (and earlier) /proc/<pid>/* does not honour setuid(2)."
Next in thread: Paul Gortmaker: "Re: Hard Lockup on 2.1.106 (bogus uart401 base)"
Reply: Paul Gortmaker: "Re: Hard Lockup on 2.1.106 (bogus uart401 base)"

Hmm.. please look @ my previous post in linux-kernel. There are fixes
for both 2.0 and 2.1. In your fix you forgot to kill unneeded line.

Vadim

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Remote fork() and Parallel programming"
Previous message: Martin Mares: "Re: [PATCH] Cyrix detection for kernels 2.0.34+"
Maybe in reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "BUGFIX: 2.1.106 (and earlier) /proc/<pid>/* does not honour setuid(2)."
Next in thread: Paul Gortmaker: "Re: Hard Lockup on 2.1.106 (bogus uart401 base)"
Reply: Paul Gortmaker: "Re: Hard Lockup on 2.1.106 (bogus uart401 base)"