Re: v2.1.106 (and earlier) /proc/<pid>/* is a mess...

Vadim E. Kogan (vadim@vadim.gem.net)
Sun, 14 Jun 1998 18:00:09 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: no ppp in 2.1.105?"
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: df ignores ramdisk mount"
Maybe in reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "v2.1.106 (and earlier) /proc/<pid>/* is a mess..."

Vadim E. Kogan wrote:
>
> Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> >
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > We (Vadim and me) were debugging some stuff in fs/proc/base.c and
> > discovered that the bug I mentioned earlier disappears if we remove the
> > p->dumpable || (ino == PROC_PID_INO) check in proc_pid_fill_inode().
> Well, the right way is:
>
> ( !p->dumpable || ino == PROC_PID_INO )
Hell, way a) was correct - no check, unless somebody will explain me the
reason.

Vadim

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: no ppp in 2.1.105?"
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: df ignores ramdisk mount"
Maybe in reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "v2.1.106 (and earlier) /proc/<pid>/* is a mess..."