Re: Remote fork() and Parallel Programming

Rik van Riel (H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl)
Sat, 13 Jun 1998 22:40:12 +0200 (MET DST)


On Fri, 12 Jun 1998, Larry McVoy wrote:

> My personal feeling is that processes wil have to be "objectified" in
> the same way that files are "objects". So just like we have different
>
> At any rate, once you have this, you have an object that you can request
> to save its state and move. You'll still need to do some work for open
> files (pipes/sockets/files/devices).

This sounds a lot better. Requesting to the process itself
means that things can be done (a'la kerneld) in _userspace_,
avoiding too big a kernel.

Of course, your point that we don't really need this
still stands :)

Rik.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Linux memory management tour guide. H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl |
| Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~riel/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu