Re: kmod & 2.1.105

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 9 Jun 1998 19:08:00 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: tytso@mit.edu: "Re: >256 ptys (previous subject line was garbage)"
Previous message: Bill Hawes: "Re: Q: fs/super.c invalidate_inodes after put_super"
In reply to: Bill Hawes: "Re: Q: fs/super.c invalidate_inodes after put_super"

> I am waiting to see if it appears in 2.1.10x (Alan currently has it in
> his diff set), and if not then I'll have to stick a __MODULE_STRING into
> all the get_module_symbol calls to make versioned kernels do the Right Thing.

Its in my diffs sent to Linus. I'll see what he says

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: tytso@mit.edu: "Re: >256 ptys (previous subject line was garbage)"
Previous message: Bill Hawes: "Re: Q: fs/super.c invalidate_inodes after put_super"
In reply to: Bill Hawes: "Re: Q: fs/super.c invalidate_inodes after put_super"