Speaking of SysRQ...

Myrdraal (myrdraal@jackalz.dyn.ml.org)
Mon, 8 Jun 1998 16:40:42 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Gerard Roudier: "Re: piss poor change in ncr53c8xx/linux-2.1.104"
Previous message: Gregory Hinton Nietsky: "Thx for 2.1.105"
In reply to: Spirilly: "Thrashing madhouse"
Next in thread: Simon Richter: "Re: Speaking of SysRQ..."
Maybe reply: Simon Richter: "Re: Speaking of SysRQ..."

On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 05:27:00PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
Hi,
> >Then why not add a DEBUGGING section to the configuration, like the
> >EXPERIMENTAL one? Warning that stuff enabled this way might only work on
> >the writer's machine, that it might break other stuff, and so on...
> It can go under `Kernel hacking' along with profiling and magic sysreq.
Speaking of magic sysrq, is there any reason it's still in the
'kernel hacking' section? IMHO it's a stable and extremely useful
feature.
-Myrdraal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Gerard Roudier: "Re: piss poor change in ncr53c8xx/linux-2.1.104"
Previous message: Gregory Hinton Nietsky: "Thx for 2.1.105"
In reply to: Spirilly: "Thrashing madhouse"
Next in thread: Simon Richter: "Re: Speaking of SysRQ..."
Maybe reply: Simon Richter: "Re: Speaking of SysRQ..."