Re: port_t again, sorry didn't type the whole thing.

Jes Degn Soerensen (jds@kom.auc.dk)
02 Jun 1998 15:45:07 +0200


>>>>> "Janos" == Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas-nouce/priv-#DyQtpWAZZ3xFtWelno54PCx.kde@lk9qw.mail.eon.ml.org> writes:

Janos> The I/O port number range, thus the C type needed to represent
Janos> it is not just a function of the CPU architecture, but more so
Janos> of the bus type (think PCI). Also (IMHO), the in/out
Janos> routines/macros are not quite useful for multiple (I/O) buses
Janos> reachable through bridges. Although handling these "extra"
Janos> situations seems to be uninteresting for almost everyone but
Janos> me.. :)

Not just for you I'd say ;-)

Adding a bus identifier parameter to the inb/outb macros would be nice
for people having multiple different busses which are not merged into
the same IO space as it is done on the PC.

Jes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu