> This should never happen if update/bdflush is running in userspace,
> which guarentees a dirty buffer flush ever minute or so.
Perhaps a trivial question, but does this mean that update should run at a
higher priority than normal user processes? Should update be guaranteed
never to be starved?
----
Aaron J. Grier | "We have no intention of shipping another bloated
agrier@cse.ogi.edu | operating system and forcing that down the throats of
0x0663D1A9 | our Windows customers." -- Paul Maritz, Microsoft GVP
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu