AFAIK there are no other known problems with egcs and 2.0.3[34]; people
have been running kernels built with them for months now.
This minimal patch shouldn't be a problem for 2.0.34, right??!?!! ;-)
Index: arch/i386/kernel/ioport.c
--- arch/i386/kernel/ioport.c.orig Wed, 15 Apr 1998 07:57:03 +0200 smurf (kernel
_linux/i/10_ioport.c 1.7.2.1 644) base.9
+++ arch/i386/kernel/ioport.c Wed, 15 Apr 1998 08:17:15 +0200 smurf (kernel
_linux/i/10_ioport.c 1.7.2.2 644) test.3(w)
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
asmlinkage int sys_iopl(long ebx,long ecx,long edx,
long esi, long edi, long ebp, long eax, long ds,
long es, long fs, long gs, long orig_eax,
- long eip,long cs,long eflags,long esp,long ss)
+ long eip,long cs, volatile long eflags,long esp,long ss)
{
unsigned int level = ebx;
-- Matthias Urlichs noris network GmbH- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu