Re: The GGI and EvStack debate -- Linus and such persons please reard.

Kristian Koehntopp (kris@koehntopp.de)
Sun, 29 Mar 1998 14:43:20 +0200 (CEST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: GGI and cli/sti in X"
Previous message: Steve Dunham: "NFS in 2.1.x: problems with setuid programs"

In netuse.lists.linux-kernel you write:
>THINK, DAMMIT! What the hell is the point of throwing away something that
>works 99.9% of the time for the extremely lame excuse that it fails 0.1%
>of the time? Instead, the GGI debate has always been how everything must
>be rewritten to use new and completely untested interfaces that currently
>work 0% of the time, as it if is easier to fix that..

Will you please tell us then how to fix these very real problems
Pawel cited?

Thanks,
Kristian

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: GGI and cli/sti in X"
Previous message: Steve Dunham: "NFS in 2.1.x: problems with setuid programs"