Re: Securelevel bitmap patch
Clayton Weaver (cgweav@eskimo.com)
Mon, 6 Apr 1998 02:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Don't we want the granularity of the per-[user|process|thread]
capabilities mask to match the granularity of the per-resource permission
mask, whether it's all used in a particular context or not? (And by the
way, does one normally attach acls or other per-resource permission-mask
data structures to sockets, meaning there is a slot in a socket descriptor
for it? Or does this apply to ports only? Or neither?)
Regards, Clayton Weaver cgweav@eskimo.com (Seattle)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu