Re: 2.1.91 and 2.0.34-pre4 comparison

MOLNAR Ingo (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Sat, 28 Mar 1998 19:34:50 +0100 (CET)


On Sat, 28 Mar 1998, Samuli Kaski wrote:

> Insipired by compiler tests conducted here I did the same thing. The
> used tree was 2.1.91.
>
> make dep; make clean; make zImage took on
>
> 2.0.34-pre4 10 min 36 sec
> 2.1.91 9 min

> Nice, not mindblasting though, improvement I would say.

given that the compiler has not changed between those two compiles, and
only 20-30% of the compilation time is 'spent' in the kernel, it is
something like a 50% perceived kernel speed improvement ...

['spent' is the sum of "spent executing" and "spent waiting"]

-- mingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu