Re: 2.1.91 swap performance: jerky.

Rik van Riel (H.H.vanRiel@fys.ruu.nl)
Thu, 2 Apr 1998 14:44:55 +0200 (MET DST)


On Thu, 2 Apr 1998, Alan Cox wrote:

> > The main problem as far as I see is that while the pages can be quickly
> > free'd when required, the fragmentation worries me. It needs to be
> > integrated with the buddy system somehow (ie it should coalesce using the
> > buddy system, but we could then re-extract the page when required. Or
> > something).
>
> Don't we have enough fragmentation problems and fixes collected in the
> mm layer now to hint that maybe the right answer post 2.2 is to go from
> a buddy to zone allocator or similar.

Yes, we really should. With 2.1.91, we've effectively
shown that the buddy system doesn't work...
At least not for 'small' systems.

Rik.
+-------------------------------------------+--------------------------+
| Linux: - LinuxHQ MM-patches page | Scouting webmaster |
| - kswapd ask-him & complain-to guy | Vries cubscout leader |
| http://www.fys.ruu.nl/~riel/ | <H.H.vanRiel@fys.ruu.nl> |
+-------------------------------------------+--------------------------+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu