Re: WLinux, kinda [OFFTOPIC] comment

Joseph Malicki (jmalicki@geocities.com)
Sat, 28 Mar 1998 03:25:39 -0500


The WLinux already (kind of) exists- its called GNU-Win32 by Cygnus Solutions -
http://www.cygnus.com/misc/gnu-win32/
It is a GPL'd, fully POSIX compliant version of GNU tools that runs under 95
and NT, including bash, gcc, etc. Just about any UNIX program should compile
under it, though it is still in beta. It did result in the first
implementation of Kerberos under NT, for instance. It's probably not worth the
time to develop WLinux when this is available, even though it doesn't run linux
binaries. But a linux binary loader in conjunction with gnu-win32 would work
nicely.......

Joe Malicki

Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote:

> > The WLinux idea (high level):
> >
> > Create a configuration and distribution of Linux that will run 'under'
> > Win95 and WinNT using virtual device stubs to access native device
>
> Sounds like a decent idea but.. Have you taken into account the fact that
> when windows crashes (heh) so will WLinux? Besides, call me paranoid if
> you want, but if you give problems to Gates be sure he'll find a way to
> either buy it or make it useless with some new feature that is needed
> for windows to work and that renders WLinux unoperative.
>
> Let's face it, if all keeps going the way it's going now, we'll soon see
> how microsoft really dominates the pc scene both in the software and
> hardware layer, and as stated in linux-kernel before, linux users will
> have to use sucky win98 stuff, use alternative (and prolly low
> performance) hardware or move to some other architecture.
>
> If ms can scare OEMs enough so they keep installing IE, or to keep silence
> of why they don't install it, and with all that win98/pc99 rumours
> floating around, why don't you think we are about to say bye to our x86?
>
> - "Hey look, this new card is for windows and only $xx!"
> - "Yes, but it's braindead and will hurt your performance. Take that one
> over there. Besides, it's not an ope.."
> - "Why that one?"
> - "Because it's better, sinc.."
> - "But I can do the same with this one, it's cheaper, and its for windows!"
>
> Just because windows has such a big share of the OS market, in who do you
> think manufacturers will focus? Joe Winloser, or Joe Linuxer? With who do
> you feel they will make more money?
>
> Of course, it might result in people buying more, say, alphas, and the
> price of those alphas going doooown even more so the price/performance
> ratio is quite more competitive and incentivates people to buy. Me? Nobody
> is going to force me to use such $%^# hardware (and by extension, only
> what Gates wants me to run), and I hope there are more people out of there
> with the same opinion.
>
> *sigh* Long Live Linux! :) .. and sorry for the rambling.
>
> ____/| Ragnar Hojland (tech.support@redestb.es) [LLL] Fingerprint 94C4B
> \ o.O| 2F0D27DE025BE2302C
> =(_)= "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for 104B78C56 B72F0822
> U chaos and madness await thee at its end." hkp://keys.pgp.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu