Re: Avoiding SMP

Chris Wedgwood (cw@ix.net.nz)
Wed, 11 Mar 1998 03:41:58 +1300

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Martin Imrisek: "sigcontext_struct -> sigcontext change (When?)"
Previous message: Ivan Shvedunov: "MAD16 and 2.1.88/89"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Talbot-Wilson: "Avoiding SMP"

Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 06:41:47 -0600 (CST)
From: Thomas Molina <tmolina@probe.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: Avoiding SMP
In-Reply-To: <199803100812.VAA10787@caffeine.ix.net.nz>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980310063758.5006B-100000@wr5z>

Why is the SMP line uncommented by default anyway? If most people are
building UP kernels, the default should be UP IMHO.

Because His Holiness uses SMP?

-cw

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Martin Imrisek: "sigcontext_struct -> sigcontext change (When?)"
Previous message: Ivan Shvedunov: "MAD16 and 2.1.88/89"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Talbot-Wilson: "Avoiding SMP"