Re: [PATCH] Cyrix setup

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Mon, 9 Mar 1998 10:41:31 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pavel Machek: "2.1.89 broken?"
Previous message: Gabriel Paubert: "Re: Boot Problem with 2.1.89"

> Seconded. IMO, two features that are not present in the current 2.1 kernel
> that should be for Cyrix, are: 1.) HLT-on-idle, and 2.) NO_LOCK set by
> default. The justification is this: If these options go into the kernel

I can just about see the case for #1. The NO_LOCK case was reported to
hang X for some people. An alternative was posted that probably should
be set at boot.

If you do HLT-on-idle make sure you handle it with the nohlt option at
boot properly so you can nohlt a Cyrix

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Pavel Machek: "2.1.89 broken?"
Previous message: Gabriel Paubert: "Re: Boot Problem with 2.1.89"