Re: GGI debate and etc.
26 Feb 1998 11:09:50 +0100

Bill Broadhurst <> writes:

> Besides, the code is in the tree whether it's compiled or not. THAT's
> to what I object.

Any reason you can't just rm(1) it? And use cvs to update your tree -
last time I looked it wouldn't create new directories unless you told it

Perhaps it's time to make the kernel *source* more modular?


If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to