Re: bad rept. about smbfs (2.1.81, NT4)

Bill Hawes (whawes@star.net)
Sat, 24 Jan 1998 09:33:38 -0500


vt wrote:
>
> mounted dirs are d--xr--r--, no response to -d argument. ls works maybe
> a little faster than with 2.1.80.

Hmm, I just tried setting various directory permissions with -d xxxx, and it
seemed to work OK. Are the file permissions working properly?

> mounts expire after some time, smbumount complains: smb_trans2_request,
> result = -32, setting invalid.

Smbumount complains? If a mount has timed out, even unmounting may cause it to
try to reconnect, but the umount should succeed in any event.

If you try to access the fs again after timing out, does it reconnect properly?

Regards,
Bill