On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, you wrote:
>Come on! We have released 0.0.9, _not_ 1.0. The CVS tree is not guaranteed
>to compile, it's an unstable development version, nothing more, nothing
>less.
By the way: The "official" version 0.0.9 isn't compiling either...
On the one side I see that for the development work it would be useful
to get it integrated in the latest kernel but on the other side I see
a package with nice goals but doen't work even a little bit
-> It's simply to early to integrate it into the kernel IMHO
>Instead of complaining, perhaps you could report the problems you have
>encountered to the GGI mailing list, or if you are not on it, you can send
>it to me and I will forward it.
I just subcribed to the mailing list and I'm sure I will contribute to it as
soon as I have time for such things again...
>If you have already reported the problem, then we will fix it. It might
>not be today, and it might not be tomorrow either, but we'll get around to
>it.
I work hard on understanding how it works and if I get the trick
I'll be glad to support development...
>While it is way to early to integrate GGI into the mainstream kernel I
>would still like to point out that GGI _is_ succesfully running on quite a
>lot of systems, so condemning it for a development version not working on
>_yours_ is a bit childish, at least from my point of view.
I wouldn't complain if it just worked a little bit but it don't...
Okay, I have to admit that the kernel compiles but it didn't take
a long time to realize that having just the compiled kernel
restricts use of the whole system.
To get a bonus of it you have to have at least the libraries
which don't compile :(( ....
Servus,
Daniel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNMPIIGEdw1sxhJOZAQGkQAQAprnPrku9JNJSdgohNDlpTEnGttJCTtcW
yzNhhaOBhTC8YoFzPI9P5LTnMEiOH0oYeGi9Ax5H2JmfMZbiAtzMJw33c0qXkOal
I5g+FAtfR7lvRAAEbVkMHADAeJzo8eimxH6uFFOBBE6pbxq6w2GOWjwAezMp05WY
CJdkAJqK/iE=
=LPoH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----