Re: smbfs and 2.1.79 again

John Corey (kunglao@prairienet.org)
Thu, 15 Jan 1998 05:39:14 -0600


> I'm beginning to think that the problem may be with Win 95 OSR2 --
> another tester reports no trouble using Win 95 OSR1. Hopefully others
> here on the kernel list can provide reports of success or failure with a
> specific version of Win95.
>
> Regards,
> Bill

Well, with -f 3xxx it does seem more stable. The first time I tried it,
I receive "I/O error" and wasn't able to do anything with it (even
umount it). After rebooting, and a good night's sleep, I tried it again
and it seems to be working. I was able to do a du across the whole dir
(this was without the -m LANMAN1 option, so long filenames were
visible). I just received one of the errors about
smb_proc_readdir_long.