Re: SOCK_PACKET again..

Sergei Viznyuk (sviznyuk@columbus.rr.com)
Tue, 13 Jan 1998 08:40:17 -0500

>> dhcpMessage I build exactly as with previous version of dhcpd
>> which worked fine by setting IP address of interface
>> first to 0.
>
>Did you build the IP and eth header ?

sure I did, I built udp header as well,
hopefully right.
My impression is SOCK_PACKET doesn't work
the way I assume it should.
Again, why SOCK_PACKET and not SOCK_RAW ?

Thanks,
Serge