Re: devfs

Nicholas J. Leon (nicholas@binary9.net)
Sun, 11 Jan 1998 22:06:00 -0500 (EST)


On Sun, 11 Jan 1998, Pavel Machek wrote:

# Well, I do not like to be devices called like c0b0t0d0s1.
#
# I think that scsi0.0.0.0.1 would be much more acceptable. Really,
# those letters are for nothing, just one more thing to remember. If you
# maintain logical order (and this is logical), you do not need ugly
# letters in between.

Agreed. And for ide, a scheme of ide0.0.1 for
controller/{master/slave}/partition would be inline with the logic.

___________________________________________________________________________

simple is elegant nicholas@binary9.net
___________________________________________________________________________