Re: /proc/cpuinfo a bit broken in 2.1.76

David Burrows (snadge@gemcorp.com.au)
Sun, 4 Jan 1998 12:15:37 +1000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Foo Chun Choong: "Kernel oops"
Previous message: Byeong-ryeol Kim: "Re: [2.1.77] patch to make 2.1.77 sound compile, and remove missing symbols I found."
Maybe in reply to: David Burrows: "/proc/cpuinfo a bit broken in 2.1.76"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Version 2.1.70 ms-dos fs strange."
Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Version 2.1.70 ms-dos fs strange."

>> processor : 0
>> cpu family : 4
>> model : unknown
>> vendor_id : unknown
>> stepping : unknown
>> fdiv_bug : no
>> hlt_bug : no
>> sep_bug : no
>> f00f_bug : no
>> fpu : yes
>> fpu_exception : yes
>> cpuid level : -1
>> wp : yes
>> flags :
>> bogomips : 16.38
>>
>> hmm?
>
>What's bad on it?

Aah, i wasn't sure if it was supposed to say i486 or something similar.. I
suppose family 4 means the same thing.. :)

Next message: Foo Chun Choong: "Kernel oops"
Previous message: Byeong-ryeol Kim: "Re: [2.1.77] patch to make 2.1.77 sound compile, and remove missing symbols I found."
Maybe in reply to: David Burrows: "/proc/cpuinfo a bit broken in 2.1.76"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Version 2.1.70 ms-dos fs strange."
Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Version 2.1.70 ms-dos fs strange."