Re: 2.0.33 versus 2.0.31 teardrop patch

Aaron M. Ucko (amu@mit.edu)
01 Jan 1998 11:45:35 -0600


Edward Welbon <welbon@bga.com> writes:

> patch. So has the method of handling frgamentation been dealt with in
> other ways such requiring the reversal of the 2.0.31-teardrop patch?

There were multiple teardrop patches; the one you applied apparently
didn't interfere with the one that made it into the standard kernel.

> Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

"stercus fit." :-)

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko <amu@mit.edu> (finger amu@monk.mit.edu) [Stark raving sane]